Survivor 20: Heroes vs. Villians

Sandra should not have won. At first, I didn't really care, but the more I think about it, the more I believe they got it wrong.

First off - Russell is an amazing player. He's not the smartest - just as Boston Rob said, he plays to get to the final 3, but he doesn't play to win. He doesn't realize the ramifications of his actions. Sure, you can manipulate people and call them names all you want, but in the end, when those are the people that you are leaving your fate to, you miiiight wanna think twice before you call them stupid.

I am tired of the players voting for the 'nicest' person, or the most 'genuine' person to win. The fact of the matter is, Russell got the final 3 twice in a row by PLAYING THE GAME BETTER THAN ANYONE ELSE. He should have won.

Ok, so let's appreciate the fact that the Jury was bitter. Sandra STILL should not have won. Parvati plays just as good of a game as Russell, but she works it like he can't - she gets people to laugh with her and love her, even after stabbing them in the back.

Still boggles my mind that Sandra won not once, but twice, and has never, EVER won a challenge. Amazing. I stand by what I said that she should not have won. At least the viewers got it right with the Fan Favorite awarded to Russell for the second time in a row.